|The full article is available to subscribers||Subscriber Login|
Implants, intrauterine devices (IUDs), and sterilization are the most effective contraceptive methods available. Pills, patches, rings, and injectables, when used correctly, are also highly effective in preventing pregnancy. Barrier and fertility-based methods have the highest rates of failure.1,2
AN IMPLANT — Nexplanon, a single-rod implant containing the progestin etonogestrel, is placed under the skin on the inside of the non-dominant upper arm and is effective for up to 3 years. As with other progestin-based methods, bleeding irregularities are common. Implants, once placed, require no adherence and provide long-term protection against pregnancy. Fertility returns rapidly after removal.3
INTRAUTERINE DEVICES — The 4 IUDs currently available in the US are all highly effective in preventing pregnancy. IUDs have... more
- AR Aiken and J Trussell. Recent advances in contraception. F1000Prime Rep 2014; 6:113.
- J Trussell and KA Guthrie. Choosing a contraceptive: efficacy, safety, and personal consideration. In: RA Hatcher et al. Contraceptive Technology: 20th revised edition. New York: Ardent Media 2011.
- In brief: etonogestrel (Nexplanon) contraceptive implant. Med Lett Drugs Ther 2012; 54:12.
- I Sivin. Utility and drawbacks of continuous use of a copper T IUD for 20 years. Contraception 2007; 75(6Suppl):S70.
- K Gemzell-Danielsson et al. A randomized, phase II study describing the efficacy, bleeding profile, and safety of two low-dose levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraceptive systems and Mirena. Fertil Steril 2012; 97:616.
- Liletta - A third levonorgestrel-releasing IUD. Med Lett Drugs Ther 2015; 57:99.
- SG Chudnoff et al. Hysteroscopic essure inserts for permanent contraception: extended follow-up results of a phase III multicenter international study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015 April 24 (epub).
- A Edelman et al. Continuous or extended cycle vs. cyclic use of combined hormonal contraceptives for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (7):CD004695.
- Three new oral contraceptives. Med Lett Drugs Ther 2006; 48:77.
- Y Vinogradova et al. Use of combined oral contraceptives and risk of venous thromboembolism: nested case-control studies using the QResearch and CPRD databases. BMJ 2015; 350:h2135.
- American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 602: depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and bone effects. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123:1398.
- DT Baird. Emergency contraception: how does it work? Reprod Biomed Online 2009; 18 suppl 1:32.
- G Piaggio et al. Effect on pregnancy rates of the delay in the administration of levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a combined analysis of four WHO trials. Contraception 2011; 84:35.
- American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin summary No. 152: emergency contraception. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126:685.
- Ella: a new emergency contraceptive. Med Lett Drugs Ther 2011; 53:3.
- AF Glasier. Ulipristal acetate versus levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a randomised non-inferiority trial and meta-analysis. Lancet 2010; 375:555.
- A Glasier et al. The rationale for use of ulipristal acetate as first line in emergency contraception: biological and clinical evidence. Gynecol Endocrinol 2014; 30:688.
- K Cleland et al. The efficacy of intrauterine devices for emergency contraception: a systematic review of 35 years of experience. Hum Reprod 2012; 27:1994.